Skip navigation

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Mapping Succession in Non-Forest Habitats by Means of Remote Sensing: Is the Data Acquisition Time Critical for Species Discrimination?
Authors: Osińska-Skotak, Katarzyna
Radecka, Aleksandra
Piórkowski, Hubert
Michalska-Hejduk, Dorota
Kopeć, Dominik
Tokarska-Guzik, Barbara
Ostrowski, Wojciech
Kania, Adam
Niedzielko, Jan
Keywords: secondary succession; species mapping; data acquisition date; hyperspectral imagery; LiDAR data; multisensor classification; Natura 2000
Issue Date: 2019
Citation: Remote Sensing, Vol. 11 (2019), Art. No. 2629
Abstract: The process of secondary succession is one of themost significant threats to non-forest (natural and semi-natural open) Natura 2000 habitats in Poland; shrub and tree encroachment taking place on abandoned, low productive agricultural areas, historically used as pastures or meadows, leads to changes to the composition of species and biodiversity loss, and results in landscape transformations. There is a perceived need to create amethodology for themonitoring of vegetation succession by airborne remote sensing, both from quantitative (area, volume) and qualitative (plant species) perspectives. This is likely to become a very important issue for the effective protection of natural and semi-natural habitats and to advance conservation planning. A key variable to be established when implementing a qualitative approach is the remote sensing data acquisition date, which determines the developmental stage of trees and shrubs forming the succession process. It is essential to choose the optimal date on which the spectral and geometrical characteristics of the species are as different from each other as possible. As part of the research presented here, we compare classifications based on remote sensing data acquired during three different parts of the growing season (spring, summer and autumn) for five study areas. The remote sensing data used include high-resolution hyperspectral imagery and LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) data acquired simultaneously from a common aerial platform. Classifications are done using the random forest algorithm, and the set of features to be classified is determined by a recursive feature elimination procedure. The results show that the time of remote sensing data acquisition influences the possibility of differentiating succession species. This was demonstrated by significant differences in the spatial extent of species, which ranged from 33.2% to 56.2% when comparing pairs of maps, and differences in classification accuracies, which when expressed in values of Cohen’s Kappa reached ~0.2. For most of the analysed species, the spring and autumn dates turned out to be slightly more favourable than the summer one. However, the final recommendation for the data acquisition time should take into consideration the
DOI: 10.3390/rs11222629
ISSN: 2072-4292
Appears in Collections:Artykuły (WNP)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Osinska-Skotak_Mapping_succession_in_non-forest_habitats.pdf4,66 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Uznanie Autorstwa 3.0 Polska Creative Commons License Creative Commons