Abstract: | Wincenty Skrzetuski, in his work The Political Law of the Polish Nation, when discussing
the issue of the functioning of the Parliament of he gentry Republic, presented a liberum veto,
a short draft which he considered one of the most disastrous mechanisms of the abuse of citizenship
freedom for Poland. A piarist made interesting historical digressions which showed some of
the weak points of the solutions functioning in the parliamentary practice of the First Republic
of Poland. Wincenty Skrzetuski, discussing a procedure of parliamentary sessions, ammended in
the period of Stanisław August, did not always clearly emphasise the solutions aiming at simplification
and acceleration of the course of the parliamentary sessions. It needs to be emphasized
that describing the problem of parliamentary clearances, he referred to disastrous parliamentary
practices and was in line with some drafters of the reforms in the gentry Republic of Poland who
demanded radical changes in the clearance procedure or even its total abolishment. Also, when it
comes to the disquisitions on the choice of the speaker of the parliamentary room, Skrzetuski
highlighted that they should finish on the third day of sessions the latest and recalled old quarrels
and earlier practices of the delay in the choice of the speaker and underlined the consequences of
the lack of its election. Skrzetuski showed different means of the parliamentary sessions delays,
including among other things, the practices of a slow down in sessions because of the combination
of rooms in order to listen to the audience of diplomats and emphasized the need to prevent
such practices in the future. The piar put an emphasis on the elements disciplining the members
of the Parliament and facilitating the course of the parliamentary sessions.
The opinions and viewpoints presented by Skrzetuski allow for ascribing him to the group
of the continuators of the work by Stanisław Konarski. |