Abstrakt: | This volume contains essays on writers who are familiar with the ambivalence
of lightness and heaviness. These writers take up the pen to seek remedies for
that which disturbs the world with its inertia, and above all, to escape the
inertia that is the word’s lot. This involves a penchant for a certain kind of
bravado or even risk, taken in order to be able to seemingly draw from the
energizing potential of what is changeable, among other things.
Lightness and heaviness constitute ambiguous categories. For those who
are by nature sluggish, sometimes weary and slow, and at the same time
constantly confronting their own limitations, everything that seems – even
if only to a small degree – unrestrained or undetermined can be refreshingly
light. That is why sometimes small signs of freedom, including dynamic suggestions
inscribed in the order of art, appear to be more interesting and more
important than the usually illusory states of weightlessness. As the subjects of
the study exemplify, allusions that allow us to recognize the unfl agging love of
life are quite unexpectedly also linked with the images of weightiness. What
counts as important is the joy of action and the creative nerve, sometimes
the height of sensation, at other times the surge of will or the momentum of
danger, but also the ability to overcome resistance, giving a sense of fullness
of life. Dynamic reinforcements and motoric impulses are important, since
movement, thanks to which we gain a sense of space, supposedly contributes
to relieving the psychological tensions that aff ect a person.
It seems important for the subjects of this study to be able to draw vital
force from the intensity of movement: fi rst of all, of course, from the transformation
of meanings inscribed in the matter of words, from the fl ow of
thoughts, and so on. Although the artists discussed here diff er in their degree the troublesome realities of life, is connected with a sense of participation in
the fl ow of existence. The subjects of this study aspire to achieve unity with
the world – also in the act of creation. What matters is the creative energy of
language, the invigorating power of the movement of meanings, the impulse
of life inscribed in the attempt to evade determinants – everything that does
not allow the story about existence to be reduced to a uniform scheme, a binding
rule. Speaking about lightness in this context, one should have in mind
exactly what tries to elude already established boundaries, fi nds itself out of
place, and is too mobile – alive – to become instrumentalized. Therefore, the
revolutionary force seems light, understood fi rst and foremost as a derivative
of the ever-moving, undomesticated creative thought.
Lightness – ambivalent and manifold: uplifting but at the same time ephemeral,
incidental and at the same time open to the constant need for movement
(preferably movement without boundaries), giving the sense of freedom
and liberty, the impression of youth and the “freshness” of the world, and yet
having its share in the weight of things – invariably remains an open question,
since what is free and undetermined does not fi t into the dictionary of fi nal
notions. This is also true of the stories of poets who constantly juxtapose
the new with the old, who try to escape the defi nitive, who tend to shy away
from endings. And if they allow for an end at all, it is a light one, consistent
with the idea of “openness” – fading away. Above all, however, the attempts
to overcome what is heavy and resisting, made (with varying success) by the
authors discussed in this volume – Bolesław Leśmian, Julian Przyboś and Tymoteusz
Karpowicz – are an expression of openness to what is manifold and
changeable, a kind of apologia for liberating movement from tension, which
allows one to rise to life again and again. |