Skip navigation

Zastosuj identyfikator do podlinkowania lub zacytowania tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/241
Pełny rekord metadanych
DC poleWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorKowalik, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorJackowiak, Weronika-
dc.contributor.authorMalicki, Julian-
dc.contributor.authorSkórska, Małgorzata-
dc.contributor.authorAdamczyk, Marta-
dc.contributor.authorKonstanty, Ewelina-
dc.contributor.authorPiotrowski, Tomasz-
dc.contributor.authorPolaczek-Grelik, Kinga-
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-11T15:38:58Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-11T15:38:58Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationNukleonika, (2017), iss. 1, s. 29-35pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn0029-5922-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/241-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction. The rapid development of new radiotherapy technologies, such as intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or tomotherapy, has resulted in the capacity to deliver a more homogenous dose in the target. However, the higher doses associated with these techniques are a reason for concern because they may increase the dose outside the target. In the present study, we compared 3DCRT, IMRT and tomotherapy to assess the doses to organs at risk (OARs) resulting from photon beam irradiation and scattered neutrons. Material and methods. The doses to OARs outside the target were measured in an anthropomorphic Alderson phantom using thermoluminescence detectors (TLD 100) 6Li (7.5%) and 7Li (92.5%). The neutron fluence rate [cm-2·s-1] at chosen points inside the phantom was measured with gold foils (0.5 cm diameter, mean surface density of 0.108 g/cm3). Results. The doses [Gy] delivered to the OARs for 3DCRT, IMRT and tomotherapy respectively, were as follows: thyroid gland (0.62 ± 0.001 vs. 2.88 ± 0.004 vs. 0.58 ± 0.003); lung (0.99 ± 0.003 vs. 4.78 ± 0.006 vs. 0.67 ± 0.003); bladder (80.61 ± 0.054 vs. 53.75 ± 0.070 vs. 34.71 ± 0.059); and testes (4.38 ± 0.017 vs. 6.48 ± 0.013 vs. 4.39 ± 0.020). The neutron dose from 20 MV X-ray beam accounted for 0.5% of the therapeutic dose prescribed in the PTV. The further from the field edge the higher the contribution of this secondary radiation dose (from 8% to ~45%). Conclusion. For tomotherapy, all OARs outside the therapeutic field are well-spared. In contrast, IMRT achieved better sparing than 3DCRT only in the bladder. The photoneutron dose from the use of high-energy X-ray beam constituted a notable portion (0.5%) of the therapeutic dose prescribed to the PTV.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/*
dc.subject3DCRTpl_PL
dc.subjectIMRTpl_PL
dc.subjectlow dosespl_PL
dc.subjectneutron dosespl_PL
dc.subjectThermoluminescent detectors (TLD)pl_PL
dc.subjectTomotherapypl_PL
dc.titleMeasurements of doses from photon beam irradiation and scattered neutrons in an anthropomorphic phantom model of prostate cancer: A comparison between 3DCRT, IMRT and tomotherapypl_PL
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlepl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/nuka-2017-0005-
Pojawia się w kolekcji:Artykuły (WNŚiT)

Pliki tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
Kowalik_Measurements_of_doses_from_photon_beam_irradiation_and_scattered_neutrons.pdf588,83 kBAdobe PDFPrzejrzyj / Otwórz
Pokaż prosty rekord


Uznanie autorstwa - użycie niekomercyjne, bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska Creative Commons Creative Commons