Abstrakt: | The monograph presents works of writing by Bernard-Marie Koltès,
a French playwright who lived in 1948—1989. The author of the monograph
sketches a portrait of the artist and outlines his writings as significant in the
development of the contemporary drama, as well as provides a detailed analysis
of issues which constitute the core of his works, namely, the notion of the Other
(l’Autre), the Other’s presence in man’s life, and all possible relations that occur
between „the I” and „the Other,” „the Stranger,” „the Unfamiliar.”
The book comprises two parts. Each one is divided into chapters. The first
part of the monograph, preceded with a preface, introduces Koltès’s works and
sets them against the background of French dramaturgy of the second half of
the 20th century. It depicts his writings and vision of the theatre as distinct
and original on the one hand, but embedded in French and foreign language
literary tradition on the other. However, what constitutes the innovative and
original character of his works is his capability of drawing from the sources
(French Classic theatre, Greek tragic dramatists) in order to produce highly
original works with regard to their content, form as well as a unique way of
presenting the plot, protagonists and the scenery. The second chapter unveils
Koltès’s artisitc path meandering through various experiences brimming with
plenteous journeys. Subsequent chapters deal with issues concerning his artistic
work, e.g. creation of protagonists, setting and time. In view of general tendencies
to reduce theatrical figures to mere letters, ordinal numbers, stripping
them of any personal details, their pasts and future plans (the Theatre of the
Absurd), Koltès’s theatre actually restores the meaning of theatrical characters
and redeems the sense of recounting their stories. However, far be it from psychological
concepts of protagonists; rather they seem to be carriers of certain
values or functions (The Dealer, The Client). Special attention is given to black protagonists (in almost all the plays) who very often play the main part in
dramatic conflicts.
Space and time — the artist’s frequent inspiration — are fundamental to
Koltès’s philosophy of the Other. Space shapes protagonists, it affects them and
imposes roles which lead to conflicts with aggression, mistrust and hostility in
the background. The creation of space is concomitant with the creation of time
which favors night, dusk, dawn when feeble light incessantly mingles with
darkness. The real, palpable and peculiar space that is physically experienced
by the protagonists at the same time stands for the mental space — the setting
of the drama. Space becomes a metaphor of life or at least one of its aspects. In
Koltès’s theatre a story of the world is illustrated by means of space.
The second part of the monograph provides an analysis of selected plays in
which the concept of the Other is set in many contexts. In The Night Just Before
the Forest (La nuit juste avant les forêts), a type of a soliloquy or semi-soliloquy
of the Speaker (who throughout sixty-three pages, expresses a restless cry for
the need to be in contact with others, to talk to them or be listened to), one
can find a twofold interpretation of the Other — as the great Absent, an object
of need and desire, or a part of ourselves, unknown yet longed for and feared
at the same time. In Black Battles with Dogs (Combat de nègre et de chiens) the
Otherness, Strangeness is revealed on many levels, discussed in the subsequent
chapter of the second part. The issue of the Other as understood by Koltès is
interwoven with such notions as solitude, desire, love, aggression as well as
destruction. There are many points of intersection between Koltès and Jacques
Lacan and his theory of the Other, which proved useful in the analysis. The
most glaring example of the perception of the Other by Koltès is a play entitled
In the Solitude of Cotton Fields. A chapter providing the analysis of this
play focuses on various readings of the nature of transaction (deal) by means
of which human relations are depicted these days.
The concept of the Other depicted in works by Koltès is close to philosophy
of Emmanuel Lévinas, who considers the Other as a sole, unrepeatable being as
far as his alterity is concerned; reads him as an individual being and stresses the
need to face the Other, accept him, start a conversation, be in contact, see into
him and read all that is hidden within. However, in his reflections Lévinas focuses
on the Other as a representative of the same race (white) and coming from
the same culture, the European civilization. Conversely, Koltès — enraptured by
Africa — extends the concept of the Other to the Other-Stranger — a representative
of a different culture, tradition which have long been regarded as inferior
by white representatives of Eurocentric civilization. Despite the fact that Koltès
himself emerges from the same culture, he actually opposes it. Moreover, he is aware of differences underlying language. Any dialogue with a person who
uses a different language, and thus perceives and understands the world from
a different perspective, demands much greater effort and tolerance in building
a dialogue. This endeavor is challenging. In many of Koltès’s plays it ends in
failure, a complete inability to find a common ground for dialogue.
The Other-Stranger is an alienated individual as well; strange to himself/
herself and to society where he/she is doomed to live. The Other-Stranger seems
estranged in the face of the world, whose existence is led somewhere off its
margins and off its values, comes from a place which escapes any definition,
moreover, he/she does not find any place that would be his/her own. This
Other-Unknown (unknown by himself/herself as well) — as Meursault in Camus
— turns to be Koltès himself, and his literary reflection is found in the
eponymous Roberto Zucco.
The artist deals with concept of the Other, for he believes that literature and
art may help understanding the Other. However, Koltès is far from formulating
any didactic messages. This theme entails all his plays as it is a natural part of
his life, his psyche, experience, and it concerns him directly, i.e. when he stands
face-to-face with an armed team of black soldiers in Laos, he turns to be the
Other then, the Stranger, the Unfamiliar arousing their curiosity, but also anger
and hostility; or when he rejects traditional European values of a culture he was
brought up in. Furthermore, the artist turns out to be the Other even in the
face of his own self when he becomes aware of his sexual orientation. He is the
one who holds the otherness inside and thus does not flee from the otherness
of another man, the Other. Alas, all his protagonists are doomed to grope in
a world where murder, seclusion and discrimination prevail, as though they
were in a cell with no way out, where one is deprived of a single opportunity
for a fortunate encounter with the Other. |