Skip navigation

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/3884
Title: Why Should We Think Critically? Comments on the Critical Rationalism of Hans Albert
Authors: Wieczorek, Krzysztof
Keywords: philosophical criticism; critical rationalism; thought of Hans Albert; thought of Leszek Kołakowski; certainty; dogmatism; metaphilosophy
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Citation: Folia Philosophica, T. 34 (2015), s. 125-149
Abstract: Leszek Kołakowski draws attention to the fact that rationalism as a philosophical method and definitive certainty as the aim are mutually irreconcilable. Each rationalist philosophy must leave a margin for uncertainty, lest it transforms into dull dogmatism. This observation of the Polish thinker becomes a source of inspiration for Hans Albert. In his work Science and the Search for Truth, he agrees with Kołakowski that goals of philosophical endeavours need redefining and puts forward his own metaphilosophical proposal, which specifies what philosophy can and should achieve in the framework of critical realism. The author examines and evaluates Albert’s proposal, referring to another view of the nature and role of philosophy as the assessment criterion—the one presented by José Ortega y Gasset in his study En torno à Galileo [About Galileo] and other writings.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/3884
ISSN: Philosophica" (T. 34 (2015), s. 125-149
Appears in Collections:Artykuły (WNS)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Wieczorek_Why_should_we_think_critically.pdf462,09 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record


Uznanie autorstwa - użycie niekomercyjne, bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska Creative Commons License Creative Commons