Skip navigation

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKubalica, Tomasz-
dc.identifier.citationFolia Philosophica, T. 35 (2016), s. 53-69pl_PL
dc.description.abstractThe subject of the paper is a polemic between Leonard Nelson and Ernst Cassirer mainly concerning the understanding of the critical method in philosophy. Nelson refutes the accusation of psychologism and attacks the core of the philosophy of the Marburg School of Neo-Kantianism. In response to those allegations, Cassirer feels obliged to defend the position of his masters and performs this task brilliantly. The present paper considers similarities and differences in the positions of both sides in this debate. I try to evaluate the arguments of both sides and argue that they took basically the same positions, while the existing discrepancies did not justify such an intense polemic. If the disputing sides had approached the discussion in a less emotional way, it could have led to substantive and interesting conclusions.pl_PL
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.subjectLeonard Nelsonpl_PL
dc.subjectErnst Cassirerpl_PL
dc.subjectMarburg Schoolpl_PL
dc.subjectcritical methodpl_PL
dc.titleThe polemic between Leonard Nelson and Ernst Cassirer on the critical method in the philosophypl_PL
Appears in Collections:Artykuły (W.Hum.)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kubalica_The_polemic_between_Leonard_Nelson.pdf244,99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Uznanie autorstwa - użycie niekomercyjne, bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska Creative Commons License Creative Commons