DC pole | Wartość | Język |
dc.contributor.author | Drożdż, Alojzy | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-23T19:52:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-23T19:52:01Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Śląskie Studia Historyczno-Teologiczne, Vol. 3, z. 2 (2010), s. 302-316 | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.issn | 0137-3447 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/9996 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In last decades, moral theology a little were forgotten about the issue of moral
obligation. An interesting matter for this is that it speaks of duty within the limits
of human rights in professional ethicists and in – negatively – in the anti-pedagogies.
The author in the article presents the first complexity of the issue of duty (aristotelianism,
stoicism, utilitarianism, personalism). It develops, among other things, motif
about new kind of deontologism – “deontologism of consumerism”. The whole ends
with a lecture about personalistic understanding of duty in light “self-determination
of person” and in light of universals – truth, goodness and beauty | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | powinność moralna | pl_PL |
dc.subject | powinność | pl_PL |
dc.subject | moralność | pl_PL |
dc.subject | norma moralności | pl_PL |
dc.subject | zło i dobro | pl_PL |
dc.subject | moral duty | pl_PL |
dc.subject | duty | pl_PL |
dc.subject | morality | pl_PL |
dc.subject | norm of morality | pl_PL |
dc.subject | wrong and good | pl_PL |
dc.title | Powinność moralna | pl_PL |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | pl_PL |
Pojawia się w kolekcji: | Artykuły (W.Teol)
|