DC pole | Wartość | Język |
dc.contributor.author | Szkaradnik, Katarzyna | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-29T19:39:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-29T19:39:09Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Racjonalia, 2013, nr 3, s. 57-80 | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.issn | 2083-9952 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2391-6540 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/10227 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Tradition has stopped being something accepted in the natural way at present,
it is inevitably a subject of reflection. In what degree does it still define us?
Should we rid ourselves of it, because it is a burden and limitation? In reference
to tradition, comprehended today as something eligible and not longer forming
fully human fates, the authoress considers the question of determinism as well
as accidence. She looks at it from the perspective of hermeneutics, wondering
if in Gadamer’s idea the tradition is really predominant and captivating, and also
considering the project of Odo Maquard. The philosopher sees the mission of
hermeneutics in making changes there, where nothing can be changed, i.e., in
our fate, but also in restoring the homeliness of world. The final thought is the
reflection on how in the light of those conceptions the religion, understood
as human objection against nonsense and accidence, would be located. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | Accidence | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Destiny | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Fate | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Hermeneutics | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Tradition | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Odo Marquard | pl_PL |
dc.title | Zasada antropiczna a dzieje kultury. Między determinizmem, tradycją i przypadkiem | pl_PL |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | pl_PL |
Pojawia się w kolekcji: | Artykuły (WSiNoE)
|