DC pole | Wartość | Język |
dc.contributor.author | Noras, Andrzej J. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-15T07:23:02Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-03-15T07:23:02Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Folia Philosophica, T. 33 (2015), s. 31-49 | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.issn | 1231-0913 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2353-9445 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/1176 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The present article concentrates on depicting the main elements of Emil Lask’s
philosophy, a distinguished Neo-Kantianist who, simultaneously, may be regarded as
Heidegger’s teacher. The meaning of Lask’s work comes down to several issues, although
in this article two of them have been emphasised: first, Kant should not be
read in the light of Fichte’s philosophy; second, in Lask’s philosophy the primacy of
practical reason in logic, characteristic for the Baden Neo-Kantianism, is questioned.
In Lask’s understanding, the logic of philosophy which is the critical theory of cognition
derives from the critical consideration over the Baden Neo-Kantianism. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | pl_PL |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | neokantyzm | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Emil Lask | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Martin Heidegger | pl_PL |
dc.title | Emil Lask. W stulecie śmierci | pl_PL |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | pl_PL |
dc.relation.journal | Folia Philosophica | pl_PL |
Pojawia się w kolekcji: | Artykuły (W.Hum.)
|