DC pole | Wartość | Język |
dc.contributor.author | Woszczyk, Agnieszka | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-15T07:52:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-03-15T07:52:41Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | "Folia Philosophica" (T. 33 (2015), s. 71-83) | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.issn | 1231-0913 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2353-9445 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/1177 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The article aims at illustrating an outline of Proclus’s argumentation leading to
the rejection of a thesis about the evil of matter in the context of relevance of objections
raised against Plotinus by Diadochus. Proclus, disposing of aporia which
Plotinus’s stance is embedded in, creates difficulties instead, which the author of
Enneads has managed to avoid. An attempt to avert the danger of dualism implies
aporetic solutions and, additionally, it generates certain explanatory limitations.
These difficulties seem to be the price that Diadochus pays for the axiological neutralization
of the matter and apeiron, which happens together with the rejection of
parallelism of relation between Good-One and plurality-evil. The existence of relative
evil in the forms of parhypostases causes difficulties with the inexplicable presence
of irrational elements in the universe, which remain beyond the system of causal influence.
Plotinus, in turn, despite the dualistic way of explaining being as a relation
of One and Indefinite Dyad (evil-matter) may maintain, which even the polemic with
gnostics illustrates, that the whole reality is turned towards Good and that everything,
including material universe, is essentially good due to unity. Acknowledging
evil per se does not lead in Enneads to the devaluation of any form of entitativity,
even that clearly marked by the influence of the matter | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | pl_PL |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | materia | pl_PL |
dc.subject | neoplatonizm | pl_PL |
dc.subject | dualizm | pl_PL |
dc.subject | monizm | pl_PL |
dc.title | Materia-zło i problem dualizmu pryncypiów. Polemika Proklosa z Plotynem w "De malorum subsistentia" | pl_PL |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | pl_PL |
dc.relation.journal | Folia Philosophica | pl_PL |
Pojawia się w kolekcji: | Artykuły (WNS)
|