DC pole | Wartość | Język |
dc.contributor.author | Noras, Andrzej J. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-12-12T09:08:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-12-12T09:08:31Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Idea. Studia nad strukturą i rozwojem pojęć filozoficznych, T. 29, nr. 1 (2017), s. 5-23 | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.issn | 0860-4487 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/11841 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The relationship between psychology and philosophy is one of the most important problems
of the philosophy of the nineteenth century, in which it reveals itself twice. It is the first time in
the post-Kantian philosophy and is associated with such thinkers as Jakob Friedrich Fries, Friedrich
Eduard Beneke, Johann Friedrich Herbart and Jürgen Bona Meyer. The second time in the
late nineteenth century, when the problem of psychologism arises. Apart from pointing out the
radical antipsychology of the Marburg Neokantian School, there are two controversies. The first
one is a discussion between Wilhelm Dilthey and Hermann Ebbinghaus, the second one is a criticism
of psychologism by Edmund Husserl. This is interesting because Husserl's understanding of
psychology is directly related to his reference to the representative of the Marburg School, Paul
Natorp. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | psychologism | pl_PL |
dc.subject | philosophy | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Marburg post-Kantian School | pl_PL |
dc.subject | criticism | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Husserl | pl_PL |
dc.title | Filozofia a psychologia : próba charakterystyki problemu | pl_PL |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | pl_PL |
dc.relation.journal | Idea. Studia nad strukturą i rozwojem pojęć filozoficznych | pl_PL |
Pojawia się w kolekcji: | Artykuły (W.Hum.)
|