Abstrakt: | Analyzing the relationship between the legislative and executive power helps to
understand that the modern democratic political regimes are usually described on the basis
of three typical models: parliamentary, presidential and semipresidential. They are more or
less differentiated internally, which naturally makes it difficult to conduct research. This is
the effect of competition on the political institutions, which takes place between the
political actors, seeking to create the most rational, from their perspective, institutional
structure. As the result, these types of activeness are beginning to blur the boundaries
between classical models of political regimes, and creates institutional arrangements
eclectic, built on the basis of specific solutions for different models of democratic political
regimes. Additionally we shouldn’t remain indifferent to the changes in the sphere of noninstitutional
determinants of the functioning of the various political regimes. The procedure
of identifying general trends in the processes of governance in the modern world becomes
possible to notify similarities in the functioning of the executive in the various models of
democratic political regimes. The trend in strengthening the executive bodies, especially
the bodies with single actors is against the traditional models of democratic political
regimes. This also determines the subsequent changes, and one of the most important is
the growing centralization of decision-making processes, coordinated and controlled by
the chief executive. |