DC pole | Wartość | Język |
dc.contributor.author | Noras, Andrzej J. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-16T08:47:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-16T08:47:20Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Roczniki Filozoficzne, T. 68, nr 1 (2020), s. 5-32 | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.issn | 0035-7685 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2450-002X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/13522 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The article is an attempt to systematize views on the subject of history of philosophy. Starting
point of the analysis are the conceptions occurring in the post-Kantian philosophy, where significant
differences in understanding the history of philosophy reveals themselves. History of philosophy
may be understood as doxography, as a history of concepts, as history of idea, as a history
of problems or, finally, as a philosophical history of philosophy. Author presents main assumptions
of each of before mentioned approaches, pointing to the special value of history of philosophy
treated as a history of problems and philosophical history of philosophy. Additionally
author appeals to Polish researchers of that problem being Kazimierz Twardowski, Zbigniew
Kuderowicz or Mieczysław Gogacz. Separate position in presented analysis takes hermeneutics
and her characteristic criticism of the position presented by Wilhelm Dilthey. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | history of philosophy | pl_PL |
dc.subject | history of concepts | pl_PL |
dc.subject | history of ideas | pl_PL |
dc.subject | history of problems | pl_PL |
dc.subject | philosophical history of philosophy | pl_PL |
dc.title | Tezy do problemu historii filozofii | pl_PL |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.18290/rf20681-1 | - |
Pojawia się w kolekcji: | Artykuły (WNS)
|