DC pole | Wartość | Język |
dc.contributor.author | Zając, Marta | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-10T10:45:27Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-10T10:45:27Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | "Przegląd Kulturoznawczy" nr 4 (2012), s. 325-334 | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.issn | 1895-975X | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2084-3860 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/15110 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The paper refl ects on so-called feminist theology. First it deals with its reception by classical
theology and reports a form of openness to new perspectives the latter (besides some
objections) voices. Then I address the inevitable tension that develops between the two
interpretative paradigms should the concepts of “man” and “God” be brought into play. The
case study for that part is a self-portrait of a feminist theologian who calls herself a resident
alien. What the analysis ultimately shows is a radical difference between the resident alien
of postmodernism and the biblical outsider: the prophet; in particular, the way the difference
in question resides in a given concept of language. My claim is that the constructionist theories
of meaning postmodernism spreads postulate not so much the arbitrariness of sense as
the false alternative between biblical God and the truth of the particular. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | feminist theology | pl_PL |
dc.subject | gender as ideology | pl_PL |
dc.subject | feminism and Catholic church | pl_PL |
dc.title | Czym (nie) jest teologia feministyczna? | pl_PL |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4467/20843860PK.12.028.0991 | - |
Pojawia się w kolekcji: | Artykuły (W.Hum.)
|