DC pole | Wartość | Język |
dc.contributor.author | Noras, Andrzej J. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-04-10T08:33:52Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-04-10T08:33:52Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | "Folia Philosophica" T. 27 (2009), s. 35-50 | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.issn | 1231-0913 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/2295 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The paper tries to systematize the views on metaphysics in the XIXth-century in
broadly taken pre-neokantian and Neo-Kantian movement. Taking the Kantian notion
of the “thing-in-itself” as a central one I point it as a key to the XIXth-century
metaphysics. Hence Jacobi, who was first to point the importance of this problem,
needs to be considered as a central figure. The analysis of Neo-Kantianism — and
especially its metaphysical current — shows that even its representatives were unable
to notice the problem of the thing-in-itself. It can be witnessed in the most famous
book of this current, that is in Kant und die Epigonen by O. Liebmann. The outcome of the presented discussion is that Neo-Kantianism did not contribute to
a metaphysical interpretation of Kant in the XIXth-century, and the dispute on the
understanding of being begins only in 1920s with a publication of the works by
Nicolai Hartmann and Martin Heidegger. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | Immanuel Kant | pl_PL |
dc.subject | interpretacja filozofii Kanta | pl_PL |
dc.subject | interpretation of Kant | pl_PL |
dc.subject | spór o metafizykę | pl_PL |
dc.subject | neokantyzm | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Neo-Kantianism | pl_PL |
dc.title | Kant w sporach o metafizykę w XIX wieku | pl_PL |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | pl_PL |
dc.relation.journal | Folia Philosophica | pl_PL |
Pojawia się w kolekcji: | Artykuły (W.Hum.)
|