Skip navigation

Zastosuj identyfikator do podlinkowania lub zacytowania tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/2365
Pełny rekord metadanych
DC poleWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorPastwa, Andrzej-
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-11T05:49:21Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-11T05:49:21Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationA. Pastwa, M. Gwóźdź (red.), “Miłość i odpowiedzialność : wyznaczniki kanonicznego przygotowania do małżeństwa” (s. 13-31). Katowice : Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiegopl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn9788322621349-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/2365-
dc.description.abstractThe pivot of this article is emphasising a paradigm of benevolence ina briefly-outlined personalistic vision of marriage: friendly and dedicated love (benevolence)constitutes the obligation in marriage. One should add to it that a contemporary“decoding” of the interpersonal marital relationship fully confirms its legal identificationas a sexual relationship. Such an understanding of a personal “infrastructure” ofa canonic marriage allows the canonist to precisely — exactly within the law — answerthe question on how a marital contract differs from other bilateral legal contracts madebetween two people. The answer can only be one: interpersonality in a marriage isqualified, namely determined by a heterosexual and total devotion to as well as acceptanceof a man and a woman in a life-long faithful covenant of love and responsibility.As much as sexuality remains in a relation of osmosis with human existence, it projectson the whole phenomenon of a legal (inter)personal meeting of a man and a woman ina marital covenant. A complex and overwhelming personal dialogue in a marriage isbased on the pillar of spouses’ sexual difference which expresses not only a bipolarotherness, but, first and foremost, a complementariness of their natures. It is in this “I”and “you” in sexually-defined dialectics, namely, in a mutual completion of spousesthat a legally relevant structure and dynamics of a “marital nature” appears (“thiswoman’s husband”/”this man’s wife”) — experiencing one’s own “I” in a unity, yetrespecting the autonomy of each of the persons, dimension of “we”. The analyses conductedhere suffice to situate this interpersonal dialectics in the bosom of each authenticmarital-family project (matrimonium in fieri) alongside the amor benevolentiae — iusresponsabile axis.pl_PL
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiegopl_PL
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectantropologia i teologia małżeństwapl_PL
dc.subjectmałżeństwopl_PL
dc.subjectmiłość małżeńskapl_PL
dc.subjectprzygotowanie do małżeństwapl_PL
dc.titleAmor benevolentiae — ius responsabile - oś interpersonalnego projektu małżeńsko-rodzinnegopl_PL
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookPartpl_PL
Pojawia się w kolekcji:Książki/rozdziały (W.Teol)

Pliki tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
Pastwa_Amor_benevolentiae_ius_responsabile_os_interpersonalnego_projektu_malzensko_rodzinnego.pdf328,24 kBAdobe PDFPrzejrzyj / Otwórz
Pokaż prosty rekord


Uznanie autorstwa - użycie niekomercyjne, bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska Creative Commons Creative Commons