DC pole | Wartość | Język |
dc.contributor.author | Pastwa, Andrzej | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-04-11T05:49:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-04-11T05:49:21Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | A. Pastwa, M. Gwóźdź (red.), “Miłość i odpowiedzialność : wyznaczniki kanonicznego przygotowania do małżeństwa” (s. 13-31). Katowice : Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9788322621349 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/2365 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The pivot of this article is emphasising a paradigm of benevolence ina briefly-outlined personalistic vision of marriage: friendly and dedicated love (benevolence)constitutes the obligation in marriage. One should add to it that a contemporary“decoding” of the interpersonal marital relationship fully confirms its legal identificationas a sexual relationship. Such an understanding of a personal “infrastructure” ofa canonic marriage allows the canonist to precisely — exactly within the law — answerthe question on how a marital contract differs from other bilateral legal contracts madebetween two people. The answer can only be one: interpersonality in a marriage isqualified, namely determined by a heterosexual and total devotion to as well as acceptanceof a man and a woman in a life-long faithful covenant of love and responsibility.As much as sexuality remains in a relation of osmosis with human existence, it projectson the whole phenomenon of a legal (inter)personal meeting of a man and a woman ina marital covenant. A complex and overwhelming personal dialogue in a marriage isbased on the pillar of spouses’ sexual difference which expresses not only a bipolarotherness, but, first and foremost, a complementariness of their natures. It is in this “I”and “you” in sexually-defined dialectics, namely, in a mutual completion of spousesthat a legally relevant structure and dynamics of a “marital nature” appears (“thiswoman’s husband”/”this man’s wife”) — experiencing one’s own “I” in a unity, yetrespecting the autonomy of each of the persons, dimension of “we”. The analyses conductedhere suffice to situate this interpersonal dialectics in the bosom of each authenticmarital-family project (matrimonium in fieri) alongside the amor benevolentiae — iusresponsabile axis. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | pl_PL |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | antropologia i teologia małżeństwa | pl_PL |
dc.subject | małżeństwo | pl_PL |
dc.subject | miłość małżeńska | pl_PL |
dc.subject | przygotowanie do małżeństwa | pl_PL |
dc.title | Amor benevolentiae — ius responsabile - oś interpersonalnego projektu małżeńsko-rodzinnego | pl_PL |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart | pl_PL |
Pojawia się w kolekcji: | Książki/rozdziały (W.Teol)
|