Skip navigation

Zastosuj identyfikator do podlinkowania lub zacytowania tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/23678
Pełny rekord metadanych
DC poleWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorStrzebonska, Karolina-
dc.contributor.authorBlukacz, Mateusz-
dc.contributor.authorWasylewski, Mateusz T.-
dc.contributor.authorPolak, Maciej-
dc.contributor.authorGyawali, Bishal-
dc.contributor.authorWaligora, Marcin-
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-21T07:04:02Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-21T07:04:02Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citation"BMC Medicine" (2022), vol. 20, iss. 1, art. no. 219pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn1741-7015-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/23678-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Umbrella clinical trials in precision oncology are designed to tailor therapies to the specific genetic changes within a tumor. Little is known about the risk/benefit ratio for umbrella clinical trials. The aim of our systematic review with meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles in cancer umbrella trials testing targeted drugs or a combination of targeted therapy with chemotherapy. Methods: Our study was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020171494). We searched Embase and PubMed for cancer umbrella trials testing targeted agents or a combination of targeted therapies with chemotherapy. We included solid tumor studies published between 1 January 2006 and 7 October 2019. We measured the risk using drug-related grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs), and the benefit by objective response rate (ORR), progressionfree survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). When possible, data were meta-analyzed. Results: Of the 6207 records identified, we included 31 sub-trials or arms of nine umbrella trials (N = 1637). The pooled overall ORR was 17.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.5–25.9). The ORR for targeted therapies in the experimental arms was significantly lower than the ORR for a combination of targeted therapy drugs with chemotherapy: 13.3% vs 39.0%; p = 0.005. The median PFS was 2.4 months (95% CI 1.9–2.9), and the median OS was 7.1 months (95% CI 6.1–8.4). The overall drug-related death rate (drug-related grade 5 AEs rate) was 0.8% (95% CI 0.3–1.4), and the average drug-related grade 3/4 AE rate per person was 0.45 (95% CI 0.40–0.50). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that, on average, one in five cancer patients in umbrella trials published between 1 January 2006 and 7 October 2019 responded to a given therapy, while one in 125 died due to drug toxicity. Our findings do not support the expectation of increased patient benefit in cancer umbrella trials. Further studies should investigate whether umbrella trial design and the precision oncology approach improve patient outcomes.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectUmbrella trialpl_PL
dc.subjectRisk-benefit balancepl_PL
dc.subjectEthicspl_PL
dc.subjectTargeted therapypl_PL
dc.titleRisk and benefit for umbrella trials in oncology: a systematic review and meta-analysispl_PL
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlepl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12916-022-02420-2-
Pojawia się w kolekcji:Artykuły (WNS)

Pliki tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
Blukacz_risk_and_benefit_for_umbrella.pdf2,42 MBAdobe PDFPrzejrzyj / Otwórz
Pokaż prosty rekord


Uznanie Autorstwa 3.0 Polska Creative Commons Creative Commons