Skip navigation

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/238
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWieczorek, Karina-
dc.contributor.authorLachowska-Cierlik, Dorota-
dc.contributor.authorKajtoch, Łukasz-
dc.contributor.authorKanturski, Mariusz-
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-11T13:36:59Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-11T13:36:59Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE, (2017), no. 3, art. no. e0173608, s. 1-31pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/238-
dc.description.abstractThe Chaitophorinae is a bionomically diverse Holarctic subfamily of Aphididae. The current classification includes two tribes: the Chaitophorini associated with deciduous trees and shrubs, and Siphini that feed on monocotyledonous plants. We present the first phylogenetic hypothesis for the subfamily, based on molecular and morphological datasets. Molecular analyses were based on the mitochondrial gene cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) and the nuclear gene elongation factor-1α (EF-1α). Phylogenetic inferences were obtained individually on each of genes and joined alignments using Bayesian inference (BI) and Maximum likelihood (ML). In phylogenetic trees reconstructed on the basis of nuclear and mitochondrial genes as well as a morphological dataset, the monophyly of Siphini and the genus Chaitophorus was supported. Periphyllus forms independent lineages from Chaitophorus and Siphini. Within this genus two clades comprising European and Asiatic species, respectively, were indicated. Concerning relationships within the subfamily, EF-1α and joined COI and EF-1α genes analysis strongly supports the hypothesis that Chaitophorini do not form a monophyletic clade. Periphyllus is a sister group to a clade containing Chaitophorus and Siphini. The Asiatic unit of Periphyllus also includes Trichaitophorus koyaensis. The analysis of morphological dataset under equally weighted parsimony also supports the view that Chaitophorini is an artificial taxon, as Lambersaphis pruinosae and Pseudopterocomma hughi, both traditionally included in the Chaitophorini, formed independent lineages. COI analyses support consistent groups within the subfamily, but relationships between groups are poorly resolved. These analyses were extended to include the species of closely related and phylogenetically unstudied subfamily Drepanosiphinae, which produced congruent results. Genera Drepanosiphum and Depanaphisare monophyletic and sister. The position of Yamatocallis tokyoensis differs in the molecular and morphological analyses, i.e. it is either an independent lineage (EF-1α, COI, joined COI and EF-1α genes) or is nested inside this unit (morphology). Our data also support separation of Chaitophorinae from Drepanosiphinae.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectDrepanosiphinaepl_PL
dc.subjectChaitophorinaepl_PL
dc.subjectmolecular-based phylogenypl_PL
dc.titleThe relationships within the Chaitophorinae and Drepanosiphinae (Hemiptera, Aphididae) inferred from molecular-based phylogeny and comprehensive morphological datapl_PL
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlepl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0173608-
Appears in Collections:Artykuły (WNP)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Wieczorek_The_relationships_within_the_Chaitophorinae_and_Drepanosiphinae.pdf6,36 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Uznanie Autorstwa 3.0 Polska Creative Commons License Creative Commons