DC pole | Wartość | Język |
dc.contributor.author | Noras, Andrzej J. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-04-17T08:35:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-04-17T08:35:42Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Ruch Filozoficzny, 2016, nr 2, s. 7-27 | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.issn | 0035-9599 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/2721 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Relation between philosophy and its history is an important element of philosophical
reflection in both Baden and Marburg school of neo-Kantianism. Associated
with the spirit of the school although not a member of it Hans-Georg
Gadamer starts, in the name of history of concepts, a discussion with understanding
of philosophy as a history of philosophical problems. Analysis leads to
a conclusion that the key to understanding the difference between the position of
Neo-Kantians (especially Hartmann) and the position of Gadamer is the understanding of philosophy. Neo-Kantians considers philosophy as a science while
Gadamer follows Heidegger who negates a scientifical character of philosophy. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | history of philosophy | pl_PL |
dc.subject | history of concepts | pl_PL |
dc.subject | history of problems | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Hans-Georg Gadamer | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Nicolai Hartmann | pl_PL |
dc.title | Problem historii filozofii. Część druga | pl_PL |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.12775/RF.2016.010 | - |
Pojawia się w kolekcji: | Artykuły (W.Hum.)
|