DC pole | Wartość | Język |
dc.contributor.author | Surzyn, Jacek | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-04-18T11:18:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-04-18T11:18:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | "Folia Philosophica" T. 32 (2014), s. 13-45 | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.issn | 1231-0913 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/2859 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The paper concerns Immanuel Kant’s view on ontological argument for the existence
of God by Anselm of Canterbury. Arguing from his critical philosophy, Kant remains
sceptical about the possibility of proving the very existence of God, which he takes as only the idea (ideal) of pure reason. Seen along such lines the concept of
God cannot be verified in the matter of experience. Kant’s critique was based on refutation
of speculative character of theological speculation related to the tradition of
natural (rational) theology. From this point of view he takes it as impossible to derive
a priori the real existence of subject merely on the basis of taking it as the
greatest thing that can be conceived, that is the best thing that might exist. The
idea of the highest being has in Kant merely intellectual status, that is, it has it
source in (pure) reason only and in this sense its real existence cannot be subject of
analysis (scrutiny). Interestingly, what Kant has in mind in his critique of ontological
argument (besides other arguments) is Descartes’ argument which is to an important
degree different from the one by Anselm. In this paper similarities and
differences between Kant’s refutation and Anselm’s support of the ontological argument
are discussed. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | Bóg | pl_PL |
dc.subject | istnienie | pl_PL |
dc.subject | ideał czystego rozumu | pl_PL |
dc.subject | a priori | pl_PL |
dc.subject | a posteriori | pl_PL |
dc.subject | sąd syntetyczny | pl_PL |
dc.subject | sąd analityczny | pl_PL |
dc.subject | czysty rozum | pl_PL |
dc.subject | God | pl_PL |
dc.subject | existence | pl_PL |
dc.subject | the ideal of pure reason | pl_PL |
dc.subject | a priori | pl_PL |
dc.subject | a posteriori | pl_PL |
dc.subject | synthetic judgement | pl_PL |
dc.subject | analytic judgement | pl_PL |
dc.subject | stating | pl_PL |
dc.subject | pure reason | pl_PL |
dc.title | Ontologiczny dowód na istnienie Boga. Immanuel Kant i Anzelm z Canterbury | pl_PL |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | pl_PL |
dc.relation.journal | Folia Philosophica | pl_PL |
Pojawia się w kolekcji: | Artykuły (WNS)
|