DC pole | Wartość | Język |
dc.contributor.author | Kania, Witold | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-12T09:47:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-06-12T09:47:05Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | "Philosophy and Canon Law" vol. 1 (2015), s. 103-120 | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.issn | 2450-4955 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/4492 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The letter Gratissimam Sane stresses that contemporary civilization based on utilitarianism
treats people like “objects” and not like “persons.” The civilization of use potentially
can affect family life. In this context, the paper considers the problem of advance directives.
The first part the article offers a historical outline of advance directives which are related to
the euthanasia movement and controversial legal battles over patients who lost their capacity to
decide. The main reasons for having a living will or health care proxy follow. The second part
of the article describes the clinical case of Mr. A., which illustrates the problems regarding the
application and interpretation of advance directives. The last part presents a discussion of the
case. It focuses on the dignity and autonomy of patient and physician and limits of the proxy
decisions. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | advance directives | pl_PL |
dc.subject | euthanasia | pl_PL |
dc.subject | health care proxy | pl_PL |
dc.subject | autonomy | pl_PL |
dc.subject | human dignity | pl_PL |
dc.title | Moral issues of advance directives | pl_PL |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | pl_PL |
dc.relation.journal | Philosophy and Canon Law | pl_PL |
Pojawia się w kolekcji: | Artykuły (W.Teol)
|