DC pole | Wartość | Język |
dc.contributor.author | Śleziński, Krzysztof | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-10-08T11:09:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-10-08T11:09:12Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Folia Philosophica, Vol. 38 (2017), s. 75-84 | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.issn | 2353-9445 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/6524 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Benedykt Bornstein belongs to a group of philosophers, who demonstrated
an opportunity for development of the scientific metaphysics with the use of the
axiomatic method. His general theory of existence was developed under the influence
of critical discussion on the major problems related to Kant’s theory of cognition.
Arguments presented in this article are to be an attempt to recognise all the assumptions
and conditions which our philosopher investigated. It is stressed that in
the context of native philosophy Bornstein is neo-kantian as well as a representative
of Polish analytical philosophy. However, his epistemological and ontological analyses
have not met the proper reception by the environment of Lvov-Warsaw School.
Although, he has remained Kazimierz Twardowski’s student in terms of character of
his methodological research, strive for terminological precision and the use of formal
language in his arguments. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | Immanuel Kant | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Benedykt Bornstein | pl_PL |
dc.subject | forms of time and space | pl_PL |
dc.subject | synthetic a priori judgments | pl_PL |
dc.title | Benedykta Bornsteina recepcja filozofii Immanuela Kanta | pl_PL |
dc.title.alternative | Benedykt Bornstein’s reception of Immanuel Kant’s philosophy | pl_PL |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | pl_PL |
Pojawia się w kolekcji: | Artykuły (WSiNoE)
|