Skip navigation

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/7732
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJanowska, Aleksandra-
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-10T10:22:02Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-10T10:22:02Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationStudia z Filologii Polskiej i Słowiańskiej, Vol 53 (2018), s. 43-58pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn2392-2435-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/7732-
dc.description.abstractThe literature devoted to spatial prepositions is quite abundant. The present article constitutes a recapitulation of the historical research which has heretofore been done on the subject. It is also an attempt at presenting the general characteristics of the evolution undergone by the class of units being described. This class is treated here in a broad manner, taking into account also equivalence. Spatial prepositions are the oldest layer of secondary forms and as far as many aspects are concerned, they constitute a very peculiar group. The attention of the scholar is drawn to lexemes such as blisko [close to, near] and the complex prepositions such as zza, poza, spoza [from behind, beyond, from beyond], which emerged quite late. Properties which are important for the evolution of the prepositions in question also include the considerable number of their variants. The direction of their evolution is quite clear also as far as their functions are concerned. The Polish language inherited from the Proto-Slavonic language precise distinctions of proximity, in contradistinction to the ablative content or expressions of considerable distances, which are indicated in a relatively general manner. The development of secondary prepositions emphasizes these properties of spatial description even further. As years went by, the disproportion between the indications of approaching and departing, of being near and being far away, did not diminish. On the contrary, it increased. The peculiarity of secondary prepositions is determined by their relationship with other classes of words that also describe spatial relations. Without doubt, this mutual relationship, which determines the evolution in spatial description, requires in-depth research.pl_PL
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectsecondary prepositionspl_PL
dc.subjectlanguage evolutionpl_PL
dc.subjectspatial relationspl_PL
dc.subjecthistory of the Polish languagepl_PL
dc.titleKilka uwag o rozwoju wtórnych przyimków przestrzennychpl_PL
dc.title.alternativeSome remarks about the development of secondary spatial prepositionspl_PL
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlepl_PL
dc.relation.journalStudia z Filologii Polskiej i Słowiańskiejpl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.11649/sfps.2018.004-
Appears in Collections:Artykuły (W.Hum.)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Janowska_Kilka_uwag_o_rozwoju_wtornych_przyimkow.pdf440,37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Uznanie Autorstwa 3.0 Polska Creative Commons License Creative Commons