Skip navigation

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/8529
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBanyś, Wiesław-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:51:08Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:51:08Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationNeophilologica, Iss. 30 (2018), s. 25-41pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn2353-088X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/8529-
dc.description.abstractIn this text we will briefly discuss some examples of the influence of the chosen philosophy and epistemology leading in a natural way to a change in research paradigm and consequently to a change in methods of linguistic description. We will present two types of situations: • The situation where one arrives at the same types, basically, of descriptive methods in the same discipline starting from different philosophical and epistemological foundations, generally without being aware of it or without having specified them (see, e.g., Predicates-Arguments Structures vs Object-Oriented Approach vs Classes of Objects vs. SketchEngine). • The situation where one arrives at the same types, basically, of descriptive methods in different disciplines starting from different or similar philosophical and epistemological foundations (see e.g., Object-Oriented Approach, Classes of Objects vs Ecological Psychology / Incorporated Radical Cognition). In a “good method”, descriptive methods derive from the philosophical and epistemological foundations adopted consciously or unconsciously. Sometimes, if the choices are more operational and more practical applications oriented, in “normal science”, in T. Kuhn’s terminology, one must go backwards to discover these foundations from the chosen descriptive principles. At the same time, different philosophical foundations can lead to the same types, at least roughly, of descriptive methods of reality. The descriptions made in the framework of different paradigms, like these paradigms, are complementary and, in the last instance, “cumulative”, thus giving a more complete description of the reality, which, while submitted to different visions, does not, naturally, change.pl_PL
dc.language.isofrpl_PL
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectObject-oriented approachpl_PL
dc.subjectecological psychologypl_PL
dc.subjectobject classespl_PL
dc.subjectlinguisticspl_PL
dc.titleNouveaux anciens paradigmes : Approche orientée objets, Classes d’objets, Psychologie écologique et Linguistiquepl_PL
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlepl_PL
Appears in Collections:Artykuły (W.Hum.)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Banys_Nouveaux_anciens_paradigmes.pdf1,28 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Uznanie autorstwa - użycie niekomercyjne, bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska Creative Commons License Creative Commons