Skip navigation

Zastosuj identyfikator do podlinkowania lub zacytowania tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/8918
Pełny rekord metadanych
DC poleWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorKubok, Dariusz-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-19T10:07:51Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-19T10:07:51Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationLittera Antiqua, Nr 10 (2015), s. 261-281pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn2082-9264-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/8918-
dc.description.abstractThe article analyzes extant fragments of Xenophanes of Colophon's works from the perspective of broadly-understood criticism, with special emphasis on fragment B 34 (Diels-Kranz). Two types of criticism can be distinguished: allocriticism and autocriticism. The first refers to criticism of the opinions of others, while the second type of criticism is directed at one's own opinions. The object of criticism discussed in the article is the possibility of possessing knowledge. In this context, it is worth considering whether Xenophanes believed that no human being, including himself, could possess clear and certain knowledge (a combination of allocriticism and autocriticism), or whether he believed himself excluded from this general rule (solely allocriticism).pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectcriticismpl_PL
dc.subjectknowledgepl_PL
dc.subjectskepticismpl_PL
dc.subjectdogmatismpl_PL
dc.subjectXenophanes of Colophonpl_PL
dc.titleAllocriticism and Autocriticism in the Views of Xenophanes of Colophonpl_PL
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlepl_PL
Pojawia się w kolekcji:Artykuły (W.Hum.)

Pliki tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
Kubok_Allocriticism_and_Autocriticism_in_the_views.pdf1,25 MBAdobe PDFPrzejrzyj / Otwórz
Pokaż prosty rekord


Uznanie Autorstwa 3.0 Polska Creative Commons Creative Commons