DC pole | Wartość | Język |
dc.contributor.author | Tyl, Mirosław | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-19T18:52:45Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-19T18:52:45Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | "Folia Philosophica" (T. 40 (2018), s. 5-15) | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.issn | 2353-9445 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/9861 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of the article is the forgotten dispute regarding the world-view
value of Thomism, taking place in the early 1960s in Polish Catholic press. I attempt
to present and evaluate the theses and arguments of both sides (critics as
well as advocates of Thomism). My claim is that the dispute anticipated the loud
discussion with Thomism initiated by J. Tischner in the 1970s and designated the
areas of confrontation, as well as, the content and the character of the arguments
for and against Thomism. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | christian philosophy | pl_PL |
dc.subject | existential Thomism | pl_PL |
dc.subject | traditional Thomism | pl_PL |
dc.subject | traditional Thomism | pl_PL |
dc.subject | world-view | pl_PL |
dc.subject | A. Siemianowski | pl_PL |
dc.subject | H. Bortnowska | pl_PL |
dc.subject | B. Celiński | pl_PL |
dc.subject | M.A. Krąpiec | pl_PL |
dc.subject | J. Tischner | pl_PL |
dc.title | Zapomniany spór o tomizm | pl_PL |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | pl_PL |
Pojawia się w kolekcji: | Artykuły (W.Hum.)
|