Abstrakt: | "In the long-winded and often tiresome discussions devoted to the problem
of possible meanings of the word “postmodern” the notion of identity is undoubtedly
one of the key terms around which the vying sides construct their
basic arguments whether they be “conservative” or “progressive.” The most
familiar issue is, of course, whether the postulated postmodern identity (if it
exists) is in fact just a developed form of the modem identity, or whether it
is a new phenomenon that radically breaks with the modem as an authoritarian
paradigm. Such discussions, although they have been pursued for at least
the last three decades, have not led to any satisfying conclusions. One of the
points of this essay will be that the reason for this might be at least partially
due to the overhasty neglect in the analyses of the construction of an identity,
and especially in its postmodern mutation, of the second term under our surveillance,
that is to say, the nature of property and its effects." (fragm.) |