DC pole | Wartość | Język |
dc.contributor.author | Zeifert, Mateusz | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-26T05:53:29Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-26T05:53:29Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-05-20 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 20 May 2020 | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.issn | 0952-8059 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1572-8722 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/14771 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The article is based on an observation that there are significant and non-arbitrary
similarities between two, seemingly quite distant, theories that address the problem
of linguistic categorization. One is the theory of open texture put forward by a prominent
legal philosopher, Herbert L.A Hart. The other is the theory of prototypes,
originated from psychological research by Eleanor Rosch and developed by cognitively-
oriented linguists, most notably Charles Fillmore, George Lakoff, and Ronald
Langacker. Firstly, the origins of the open texture theory are presented, including
the discussion of Friedrich Waismann’s and Ludwig Wittgenstein’s ideas and their
impact on Hart’s theory. Secondly, Hart’s theory of open texture is examined, based
on several articles and his masterpiece: The Concept of Law (Oxford: Oxford University
Press 1961). Thirdly, a brief introduction to the prototype theory is provided,
focusing on its reception in Cognitive Linguistics. Fourthly, a comparison of both
theories is presented, including a sketch of a broader philosophical and historical
background, as well as a detailed analysis of similarities and dissimilarities between
them. The comparison results in a conclusion that, on linguistic grounds, the open
texture theory can be viewed as an anticipation of prototype theory. Finally, several
reservations are made in order to avoid possible confusions and some obvious
objections. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | Open texture | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Prototype theory | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Cognitive linguistics | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Legal theory | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Categorization | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Vagueness | pl_PL |
dc.title | Rethinking Hart : From Open Texture to Prototype Theory - Analytic Philosophy Meets Cognitive Linguistics | pl_PL |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11196-020-09722-9 | - |
Pojawia się w kolekcji: | Artykuły (WPiA)
|