DC pole | Wartość | Język |
dc.contributor.author | Noras, Andrzej J. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-30T12:56:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-30T12:56:13Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978‑83‑226‑3654- 1 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 978‑83‑226‑3655- 8 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/14878 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The book constitutes a presentation of the views of thinkers who, for no
readily apparent reasons, have been forgotten, sidelined in some way. This is
particularly incomprehensible since each of them is an author of an extremely
interesting history of philosophy which constitutes an attempt at capturing its
events through the perspective of their given aspect event. Each aims at a different
view of philosophy, accentuating a different facet. Each is interested in
a typology of philosophy, but understands it in a different way.
Karl Groos is a thinker known not only for the history of philosophy analysed
in this book, but also for being interested in the theory of play, understood as
“exercising out” (Einübung). Published in 1924, Groos’s history of philosophy is
entitled Der Aufbau der Systeme and its main intention is to introduce order
into the multiplicity of philosophical doctrines. Groos is primarily interested in
the mystery of the logical architecture of systems, the formal aspect of their
structure.
Hans Leisegang is a thinker who deserves special attention and who twice
in his life experienced the power of totalitarianism. For the first time it happens
when he does not acknowledge Hitler as the Chancellor of Germany, and for the
second time when he refuses to submit to the Soviet power. The first time, his insubordination
is punished by prison and the loss of his professorship in Jena. The
second time, he is forced to leave Jena and move to Berlin to the newly-found
Freie Universität Berlin. Leisegang, differently to Groos, but similarly to Moog,
writes several histories of philosophy, three of which are intended to popularize
the field. It is the fourth one which sparks particular interest. The book Denkformen
is published for the first time in 1928 and for the second in 1951. The
work is built on an assumption that human thought employs a limited number of
thought structures which recur/repeat themselves in history of philosophy and,
at the same time, usurp the absolute rule — which is connected with accepting
Dilthey’s stance. Leisegang reduces all kinds of thinking in the history of philosophy
to four thought forms which are: (1) the form of thought-circles (Denkform
des Gedankenkreises), (2) the form of circle of circles (Denkform der Kreis
von Kreisen), (3) the form of conceptual pyramid (die Begriffspyramide), and
(4) The Euklidean-mathematical thought-form (die euklidisch-mathematische
Denkform).
The last philosopher to be analysed in the book is Willy Moog, Karl Groos’s
student. Out of all the thinkers discussed here, his contribution to the study of German philosophical thought is the greatest, and its material expression is embodied
in three important books from the field of German philosophy. The first
constitutes an in-depth study of psychologism and was compiled out of parts of
the author’s habilitation thesis (Logik, Psychologie und Psychologismus. Wissenschaftssystematische
Untersuchungen. Halle a. S. 1919). The second book
is the history of the newest German philosophy Die deutsche Philosophie des
20. Jahrhunderts in ihren Hauptrichtungen und Grundproblemen. Stuttgart
1922), while the third one analyses philosophy of Hegel and the followers who
draw upon his thought – Hegel und die Hegelsche Schule (München 1930).
In 1932, Moog publishes a book which constitutes a perspective of the history
of philosophy which is alternative to the ones proposed by his teacher Karl
Groos and Hans Leisegang. The work is entitled Das Leben der Philosophen
(Berlin 1932), and its subject are the philosophers’ lives, where the author tries
to show the connection between a thinker’s biography and the views which he
voiced. The work does not intent to relativise the views of a given philosopher,
but it attempts to demonstrate that a philosophical system constitutes an expression
of the most inner nature of its creator, and in this sense, what is individual
is captured in its objective meaning and transposed onto the plane of that which
is above the individual. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Katowice : Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | pl_PL |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Na tych samych warunkach 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | historia filozofii | pl_PL |
dc.subject | filozofia | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Niemcy | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Karl Groos | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Hans Leisegang | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Willy Moog | pl_PL |
dc.title | Niedocenieni myśliciele - zapomniane historie filozofii | pl_PL |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/book | pl_PL |
Pojawia się w kolekcji: | Książki/rozdziały (W.Hum.)
|