DC pole | Wartość | Język |
dc.contributor.author | Tarasek, Maciej | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-02T11:20:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-02T11:20:31Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego, 2014, nr 1, s. 259-276 | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.issn | 2082-1212 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/14933 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The presented consideration involves the possibility of granting to the Constitutional
Tribunal a greater role in scope of rulings regarding legislative omission. Legal solutions
binding in other countries, which has been presented in this work, allows to defense
of the thesis, that there is a practical possibility of ruling in aforementioned scope on level of constitutional judiciary. Polish Constitutional Tribunal has the right
to react to such omission by using so called signaling decision, which is not a sufficient
solution. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | Constitutional Court | pl_PL |
dc.subject | legislative omission | pl_PL |
dc.subject | signaling decision | pl_PL |
dc.title | Trybunał Konstytucyjny a kontrola zaniechań legislacyjnych | pl_PL |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | pl_PL |
dc.relation.journal | Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego | pl_PL |
Pojawia się w kolekcji: | Artykuły (WPiA)
|