Skip navigation

Zastosuj identyfikator do podlinkowania lub zacytowania tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/16392
Pełny rekord metadanych
DC poleWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorDrożdż, Grzegorz-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-08T12:26:35Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-08T12:26:35Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citation"Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature" (2020) Vol. 44, no. 3, s. 141-149pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn2450-4580-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/16392-
dc.description.abstractThe issue of countability and uncountability of English nouns may seem simple – nouns are count when their designations can be counted, and mass when they cannot (e.g., Huddleston & Pullum, 2002, p. 334). Consequently, we might expect that lexicographic characteristics of nouns will be generally unequivocal: count or mass. However, a closer analysis of this issue reveals several fundamental problems of a grammatical and lexicographic nature. The article analyses how grammatical problems with such classifications translate into lexicographic practice. The analysis focuses on five reputable dictionaries of English and their approaches to the issue of countability and uncountability of selected nouns.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectcount and mass nounspl_PL
dc.subjectEnglish dictionariespl_PL
dc.subjectgrammatical informationpl_PL
dc.titleGrammar vs. lexicographic practice - a few remarks on what English dictionaries do not say about countable and uncountable nouns (though they should)pl_PL
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlepl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.17951/lsmll.2020.44.3.141-149-
Pojawia się w kolekcji:Artykuły (W.Hum.)

Pliki tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
Drozdz_grammar_vs_lexicographic_practice.pdf532,59 kBAdobe PDFPrzejrzyj / Otwórz
Pokaż prosty rekord


Uznanie Autorstwa 3.0 Polska Creative Commons Creative Commons