Skip navigation

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/16392
Title: Grammar vs. lexicographic practice - a few remarks on what English dictionaries do not say about countable and uncountable nouns (though they should)
Authors: Drożdż, Grzegorz
Keywords: count and mass nouns; English dictionaries; grammatical information
Issue Date: 2020
Citation: "Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature" (2020) Vol. 44, no. 3, s. 141-149
Abstract: The issue of countability and uncountability of English nouns may seem simple – nouns are count when their designations can be counted, and mass when they cannot (e.g., Huddleston & Pullum, 2002, p. 334). Consequently, we might expect that lexicographic characteristics of nouns will be generally unequivocal: count or mass. However, a closer analysis of this issue reveals several fundamental problems of a grammatical and lexicographic nature. The article analyses how grammatical problems with such classifications translate into lexicographic practice. The analysis focuses on five reputable dictionaries of English and their approaches to the issue of countability and uncountability of selected nouns.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/16392
DOI: 10.17951/lsmll.2020.44.3.141-149
ISSN: 2450-4580
Appears in Collections:Artykuły (W.Hum.)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Drozdz_grammar_vs_lexicographic_practice.pdf532,59 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record


Uznanie Autorstwa 3.0 Polska Creative Commons License Creative Commons