DC pole | Wartość | Język |
dc.contributor.author | Nawarecki, Aleksander | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-13T11:49:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-06-13T11:49:04Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | J. Kempa, M. Giglok (red.), "Słowo, doświadczenie, tajemnica" (S. 87-101). Katowice : Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9788380125117 | - |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9788380125124 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/4559 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The text is devoted to the presence of mystery in poetry and its possibility to be
caught by literature theoreticians. The starting point is etymology of word “mystery”, which
in many Slavic languages (and also Indo-Europeans) is associated with theft. The author
considers “thievish” or “dark” understanding of mystery, which is close to Plato’s interpretations
of poetry. He recalls the conception of Karl Kerényi, Gaston Bachelard and Ferdynand
de Saussure, namely the anagram theory. However, in the spotlight one can find academic
statements, critical and poetical of two particularly “mysterious” contemporary Polish writers:
Jarosław Marek Rymkiewicz and Justyna Bargielska. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | pl_PL |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | mystery | pl_PL |
dc.subject | anagram | pl_PL |
dc.subject | G. Bachelard | pl_PL |
dc.subject | J.M. Rymkiewicz | pl_PL |
dc.subject | J. Bargielska | pl_PL |
dc.title | Tajemnica, poezja, anagramy | pl_PL |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart | pl_PL |
Pojawia się w kolekcji: | Książki/rozdziały (W.Hum.)
|