Skip navigation

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/9507
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKuśnierz, Katarzyna-
dc.contributor.authorKajor, Maciej-
dc.contributor.authorZaworonkow, Dmytro-
dc.contributor.authorLekston, Zdzisław-
dc.contributor.authorCiupińska-Kajor, Monika-
dc.contributor.authorSeweryn, Mariusz-
dc.contributor.authorLampe, Paweł-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-18T08:24:55Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-18T08:24:55Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citation"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine" Nr 6 (2015), s. 1019-1029pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn2451-2680-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/9507-
dc.description.abstractBackground. Anastomotic dehiscence and leaks are major problems in gastrointestinal surgery and result in increased morbidity and mortality. The ideal device to create anastomoses should ensure good serosal apposition without requiring either transgression of the bowel wall or the presence of foreign material for an extended period of time. Objectives. The aim of this experimental study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new compression anastomosis clip (CAC) for jejunojejunostomies and ileocolostomies by comparing CAC anastomoses with hand-sewn (HS) anastomoses in pigs in terms of healing, breaking strength and the time to create anastomoses. Material and Methods. The 11 pigs in the study underwent side-to-side CAC and HS jejunojejunostomies and ileocolostomies, for a total of 88 anastomoses. The pigs were sacrificed on postoperative day 5 (5 pigs) or 7 (6 pigs). Macroscopic, histopathological and breaking-strength examinations were performed. The time to create the anastomoses was recorded. Results. Neither group had anastomotic complications such as leakage or obstruction. Macroscopic examination showed no statistically significant differences between the groups. In the CAC group, the healing process was characterized by a lesser inflammatory reaction (p < 0.05) and very thin scar tissue at the anastomotic line (less collagen deposition and better epithelial regeneration), while the HS group had a much thicker anastomotic line. The breaking strength was significantly greater in the CAC group compared with the HS group (p < 0.05). The anastomosis time was shorter in the CAC group than in the HS group (p < 0.01). Conclusions. Anastomosis using a CAC appears to be safe and less time-consuming than HS; it was also characterized by a good healing process with little inflammatory reaction and a high breaking strength compared with HS anastomosis (Adv Clin Exp Med 2015, 24, 6, 000–000).pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectbreaking strengthpl_PL
dc.subjecthealingpl_PL
dc.subjectpigpl_PL
dc.subjectintestinal anastomosispl_PL
dc.subjectcompression anastomosis clippl_PL
dc.titleCompression Anastomosis Clips Versus a Hand-Sewn Technique for Intestinal Anastomosis in Pigspl_PL
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlepl_PL
dc.relation.journalAdvances in Clinical and Experimental Medicinepl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.17219/acem/50070-
Appears in Collections:Artykuły (WNŚiT)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kusnierz_Lekston_compression_anastomosis_clips_versus.pdf1,04 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Uznanie autorstwa - użycie niekomercyjne, bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska Creative Commons License Creative Commons