Skip navigation

Zastosuj identyfikator do podlinkowania lub zacytowania tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/9620
Pełny rekord metadanych
DC poleWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorMalicka, Ewa-
dc.contributor.authorSitko, Rafał-
dc.contributor.authorZawisza, Beata-
dc.contributor.authorHeimann, Jan-
dc.contributor.authorKajewski, Dariusz-
dc.contributor.authorKita, Andrzej-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-09T12:22:45Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-09T12:22:45Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationAnalytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Vol. 399 (2011), s. 3285–3292pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn1618-2642-
dc.identifier.issn1618-2650-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/9620-
dc.description.abstractThe paper presents possibilities and difficulties in nondestructive analysis of small multielement single crystals performed by means of X-ray spectrometry techniques: micro-X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (μ-XRF), energydispersive electron probe microanalysis (ED-EPMA), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The capability of the X-ray spectroscopy techniques in elemental analysis is demonstrated with the single crystals of selenide spinels of the general formula MxNyCrzSe4 (M+2 and N+3 are, for example, Zn+2, V+3, Ga+3, Cd+2, In+3, and Sb+3). The results of the nondestructive analyses (μ-XRF, ED-EPMA, and XPS) are compared with those obtained by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) and wavelength-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (WDXRF) following sample digestion. The present study shows satisfactory agreement between the results of μ-XRF analysis performed using the standardless fundamental parameter method and the results obtained with the WDXRF and ICP-OES analyses. If the measured single crystal is precisely positioned, the difference between μ- XRF and wet analysis (WDXRF and ICP-OES) does not exceed 5% rel. The reliable results of ED-EPMA can be obtained only if the measured area is sufficiently large, i.e., of 200×300 μm. Even if this condition is fulfilled, the relative difference between the ED-EPMA and the wet analysis may reach 10% rel. In case of the XPS analysis, the accuracy of results depends on the proper preparation of the sample surface. It should be free of contamination that can be obtained by scraping in situ in ultrahigh vacuum. The ion etching, commonly used for cleaning the surface, leads to preferential sputtering; therefore, the reliable results cannot be obtained.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectMicro-XRFpl_PL
dc.subjectEPMApl_PL
dc.subjectXPSpl_PL
dc.subjectSelenide spinelpl_PL
dc.subjectNondestructive analysispl_PL
dc.subjectChalcogenide compoundspl_PL
dc.titleNondestructive analysis of single crystals of selenide spinels by X-ray spectrometry techniquespl_PL
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlepl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00216-010-4240-4-
Pojawia się w kolekcji:Artykuły (WNŚiT)

Pliki tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
Malicka_Nondestructive_analysis_of_single_crystals.pdf587,61 kBAdobe PDFPrzejrzyj / Otwórz
Pokaż prosty rekord


Uznanie autorstwa - użycie niekomercyjne 3.0 Polska Creative Commons Creative Commons