Zastosuj identyfikator do podlinkowania lub zacytowania tej pozycji:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/12323
Tytuł: | Prawo właściwe dla skutków przelewu wierzytelności w stosunku do osób trzecich. Uwagi z perspektywy międzynarodowego prawa upadłościowego |
Autor: | Klyta, Wojciech |
Słowa kluczowe: | assignment; Rome Regulation; location of the claim; Insolvency Regulation; property; center of main interest of the debtor; detrimental acts; rights in rem |
Data wydania: | 2019 |
Źródło: | Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego, 2019, t. 24, s. 47-75 |
Abstrakt: | The claims are rights in personam but the assignment of claims
has a hybrid nature. Abolishing the “nomina ossibus inhaerent” rule has increased commercial
significance of the assignment of claims. However, the contemporary legal situation
leaves parties with great legal uncertainty, as to the question under which circumstances
does the cross — borders assignment is valid. A recent judgment of the CJEU of
9 October 2019 (C — 548/18) in case BGL BNP Paribas SA v. TeamBank AG Nürnberg
has augmented this uncertainty. The Luxemburg Court ruled that: “Article 14 of the
Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June
2008 (‘Rome I’) must be interpreted as not designating, directly or by analogy, the applicable
law concerning the third-party effects of the assignment of a claim in the event of
multiple assignments of the claim by the same creditor to successive assignees”. In this
situation, one would highly welcome an attempt to establish a new set of conflict of laws
rules relating to the law applicable to third — parties effects of the assignment of claims.
This attempt has recently been made by the European Commission in its Report “on the
question of the effectiveness of an assignment or subrogation of a claim against third parties
and the priority of the assigned or subrogated claim over the right of another person”,
dated 29 September 2016. In the present article, the author reviews the most important
propositions formulated in the conflicts’ doctrine through the “lens” of the international
insolvency law. Multiply provisions of the Regulation (EU) 2015/848 of 20 May 2015 on
insolvency proceedings (recast) — despite many judgments of the CJEU in this area —
also lack certainty. Insolvency is a foreseeable risk, but without clear rules concerning the third parties’ effects of the assignment of claims, it may become unenforceable for the
creditors of the assignor. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/12323 |
DOI: | 10.31261/PPPM.2019.24.03 |
ISSN: | 2353-9852 |
Pojawia się w kolekcji: | Artykuły (WPiA)
|