Zastosuj identyfikator do podlinkowania lub zacytowania tej pozycji:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/1750
Tytuł: | Kolizja postępowań przed sądem państwowym i polubownym : uwagi na tle europejskich uregulowań procesowych |
Autor: | Sznajder-Peroń, Katarzyna |
Słowa kluczowe: | Brussels I Regulation; international arbitration; exclusion of arbitration from the scope of Brussels I; parallel proceedings; effects of arbitration clauses; reform of Brussels I |
Data wydania: | 2012 |
Źródło: | Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego, T. 10 (2012), s. 49-70 |
Abstrakt: | The text deals with the highly controversial problem of the interface between
state proceedings and the more party autonomy — oriented field of arbitration. First, the
current legislative situation is presented, especially the relationship between uniform
acts such as Brussels I and the New York Convention on Arbitration of 1958. Specifically,
the author deals with the extent of the exclusion of arbitration laid down in art. 1 S. 2 d)
of Brussels I Regulation. The question is being raised whether a state court is competent
under the Regulation to assess the validity of an arbitration agreement, and, the clause
being declared null and void, to judge on the merits within the Regulation framework.
A discussion follows on problems arising as to the influence state courts are entitled to
exercise on other proceedings in order to “protect” arbitration taking place in their own
country, e.g. in the form of anti‑
suit injunctions. Finally, there follows a discussion of
possible solutions on EU level to deal with the presented problems, especially, whether
amendments should be made to Brussels I to make the system work more effectively
without hampering the development of arbitration on our continent. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/1750 |
ISSN: | 1896-7604 |
Pojawia się w kolekcji: | Artykuły (WPiA)
|